WC3 Chess » Smith wisely and carefully manipulated his pads fr

As the RBC Canadian Open at the Royal Montreal Golf Club in Ile Bizard, Quebec draws near, Bodog.ca has posted the odds for who has the best chance in taking home the $1,026,000 winning share at this years tournament. Leading the way is Dustin Johnson, Jim Furyk, and Matt Kuchar all with 12/1 odds. Defending champion Brandt Snedeker is at 22/1 after capturing the title last year at Glen Abbey Golf Club. Its been 60 years since a Canadian born golfer has won the Canadian Open. According to Bodog, Graham DeLaet is the Canuck with the best odds to snap the streak at 25/1. David Hearn is close beind at 45/1 odds. Hearn is coming off a solid performance at the British Open, finishing the tournament at 3-under par. Mike Weir has 125/1 odds. The 44-year-old is trying to build momentum from his second place finish at the Byron Nelson Championship in May. Bodogs Canadian specials have DeLaet at 2/9 to make the cut, Hearn at 1/3 and Weir at 10/13. Watch coverage of the first two rounds live on TSN and TSN GO on Thursday and Friday beginning at 3pm et/Noon pt. Canadian Open - Outright Winner Dustin Johnson 12/1Jim Furyk 12/1Matt Kuchar 12/1 Graeme McDowell 16/1 Charl Schwartzel 18/1 Brandt Snedeker 22/1Luke Donald 22/1 Graham Delaet 25/1 Hunter Mahan 28/1 Charley Hoffman 35/1 David Hearn 45/1 Bo Van Pelt 50/1Carl Pettersson 50/1Kevin Chappell 50/1Russell Knox 50/1 Aaron Baddeley 66/1Ben Crane 66/1Ernie Els 66/1K.J. Choi 66/1Nick Watney 66/1Robert Garrigus 66/1Seung-yul Noh 66/1Tim Clark 66/1William Mcgirt 66/1 Chad Campbell 80/1Charlie Beljan 80/1Erik Compton 80/1Jason Bohn 80/1Jerry Kelly 80/1Luke Guthrie 80/1Matt Jones 80/1Pat Perez 80/1Patrick Rodgers 80/1Retief Goosen 80/1Sang-Moon Bae 80/1Scott Brown 80/1Scott Piercy 80/1 Andres Romero 100/1Camilo Villegas 100/1Jeff Overton 100/1Jhonattan Vegas 100/1John Huh 100/1Johnson Wagner 100/1Martin Laird 100/1Morgan Hoffman 100/1Stewart Cink 100/1Stuart Appleby 100/1Thomas Aiken 100/1Tim Wilkinson 100/1Michael Putnam 100/1 Adam Hadwin 125/1Brian Davis 125/1David Lingmerth 125/1Geoff Ogilvy 125/1Gonzalo Fernandez-Castano 125/1Robert Streb 125/1Tommy Gainey 125/1Troy Merritt 125/1Mike Weir 125/1 Canadian Open - Top 5 Finish Jim Furyk 5/2Dustin Johnson 11/4Matt Kuchar 11/4Graeme McDowell 3/1Charl Schwartzel 7/2Brandt Snedeker 9/2Graham Delaet 5/1Luke Donald 5/1Hunter Mahan 11/2Charley Hoffman 7/1David Hearn 15/2 CANADIAN SPECIALS Canadian Open - Will Graham Delaet Make The Cut? Yes -450 (2/9)No +300 (3/1) Canadian Open - Will David Hearn Make The Cut? Yes -300 (1/3)No +220 (11/5) Canadian Open - Will Mike Weir Make The Cut? Yes -130 (10/13)No EVEN (1/1) Eddie Vanderdoes Jersey . According to the sportsbook BoDog, the Stampeders are 8/5 favourites to take home the Grey Cup at Mosaic Stadium in Regina on November 24. Kenny Stabler Jersey .com) - The Kansas City Chiefs activated linebacker Joe Mays from short-term injured reserve on Saturday. http://www.officialoaklandraidersfootball.com/authentic-brandon-parker-jersey-womens . - The Washington Redskins have signed free agent offensive lineman Mike McGlynn. Rashaan Melvin Jersey . Amaro broke the NCAA all-time record for receiving yards in a season for a tight end with 1,352 during his junior campaign, eclipsing the mark of 1,329 set by Rices James Casey in 2008. Fred Biletnikoff Jersey . He just didnt expect them to be this good. Darrun Hilliard scored 19 points to lead No. 6 Villanova to a dominating 77-59 victory over Georgetown on Saturday, preserving the Wildcats hopes of a No.Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule enforcements or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.ca. Kerry, Just watched the shootout in the Coyotes/Leafs game and I have to ask, why was the James van Riemsdyk goal allowed to count? All of the video replays we were shown on TV were inconclusive about whether the puck had entirely crossed the line or not. Neither ref made an attempt at blowing the whistle or pointing at the net and no call was made on the play as it was sent right to the video replay judges. Only after the replay was reviewed was the goal allowed to count. Paul Devorski told Coyotes coach Dave Tippett that he was sure it was a goal. If Devorski was so confident it was a goal then why didnt he signal a goal and blow the whistle? Why did he send it to the video replay? Their indecision and explanation do not seem to match up. Your insight would be greatly appreciated as it appears the Leafs were the recipients of the proverbial home ice advantage! Thanks,Chad Conner in Phoenix Chad, After witnessing JVRs ultimate shootout goal, neither referees (Rob Martell and Paul Devorski) signaled a goal nor did they make a waive off. Understandably, they appeared uncertain and indecisive as they searched to find the puck from underneath Smiths pads. The puck did not become visible until Smith wisely and carefully manipulated his pads from inside the net and kicked his feet forward until the puck appeared well out in the middle of his goal crease. Since no signal was made by either referee as required, I must assume they did not and could not see the puck across the goal line. As such, they were unable and unwilling to make an initial call. The only alternative for Martell and Devorski at this point was to pass the decision upstairs to video review which has become the safety net for the official. Video review rendered an inconclusive verdict since no camera angle was available to clearly demonstrate the puck crossing the goal line due to the obstructed view from Smiths pads! The call then reverted back to the referee(s) on the ice for a final decision. Referee Rob Martell was on the head set throughout the video review process. The referee was either provided with input and assistance from upstairs and/or Martell used common sense and logic to deduce that since the puck was under Mike Smiths padss and Smiths pads were across the goal line a legal goal should be counted.dddddddddddd I agree with the referees ultimate decision in that it is most logical and probable that the puck completely crossed the goal line. I have personally stood on the goal line and signaled a goal when the puck was caught by the goalkeeper with his glove across the line and then pulled his glove and the puck forward out of the net. The puck was in the glove and the glove was across the goal line and inside the net. I also counted goals when the goalkeeper carried the puck across the line and into the net. I made these decisions immediately and without hesitation. There was no video review to act as a safety net. Even when the review process was implemented I wanted to see the play and make the call. - This very late decision by the on-ice referee Thursday night following video review highlights at least two flaws in the current system. The first is that two different standards can be applied in determining goals. Video review must clearly see the puck across the goal line with an unobstructed view before they will verify a goal. The evidence must be unequivocal! If this cant be achieved video review personnel render an inconclusive verdict even in cases where it appears logical that the puck would have crossed the line. - The referee, on the other hand, as we saw demonstrate on this call, allowed a goal to stand by applying logic, common sense and the power of deduction to determine that in his judgment the puck had crossed the goal line. My recommendation is to provide the referee with the authority to review controversial goals at ice level (including goalkeeper interference) and have the final authority and judgment in these matters. The optics on JVRs ultimate goal determination looked ridiculous! Referee Martell (and Devorski) did not make a decision on the play in real time. Martell then spent several minutes communicating through a head set and staring into space. Following the inconclusive review verdict, Referee Martell was forced to render a final decision - one that he was unable or unwilling to make in real time! The Refs are supposed to make a call one way or the other in real time; let them also make the final decision through the video review process, As Referee Rob Martell demonstrated Thursday night, thats in their job description and what they get paid to do! Cheap Buffalo Sabres Gear Wholesale Calgary Flames Jerseys Cheap Adidas Colorado Avalanche Jerseys Montreal Canadiens Outlet Store Wholesale New Jersey Devils Jerseys Adidas Arizona Coyotes Jerseys Cheap Adidas Boston Bruins Jerseys Cheap Adidas Carolina Hurricanes Jerseys Chicago Blackhawks Shop Free Shipping Wholesale Columbus Blue Jackets Jerseys Dallas Stars Shop Free Shipping Cheap Adidas Detroit Red Wings Jerseys Anaheim Ducks Jerseys China Wholesale Edmonton Oilers Jerseys Florida Panthers Shop Free Shipping Wholesale Los Angeles Kings Jerseys Minnesota Wild Outlet Store Cheap Adidas Nashville Predators Jerseys Cheap Adidas New York Islanders Jerseys New York Rangers Winter Classic Jerseys Cheap Adidas Ottawa Senators Jerseys Cheap Adidas Philadelphia Flyers Jerseys Wholesale Pittsburgh Penguins Jerseys Cheap Adidas San Jose Sharks Jerseys St. Louis Blues Winter Classic Jerseys Wholesale Tampa Bay Lightning Jerseys Toronto Maple Leafs Outlet Store Vancouver Canucks Outlet Store Cheap Adidas Vegas Golden Knights Jerseys Cheap Adidas Washington Capitals Jerseys Cheap Adidas Winnipeg Jets Jerseys ' ' '